Space Phenomenon

1.13 The Neutrino

    Neutrinos are a type of fundamental particle with no electric charge, the property of mass is at present unresolved but tends towards zero. It is a lepton and therefore correspondingly has spin ½. As a lepton it also follows that the particle like the electron and other leptons is not subject to the strong nuclear force. There are three known neutrinos each associated with a given charged lepton. The three are the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino and the tau neutrino.

     The electron neutrino was proposed first as a need to explain beta decay. Beta decay is controlled by the weak force and involves the decay of a neutrino, more specifically it is the ejection of an electron from the neutron, leaving behind a lack of negative charge (read positive charge). The beta decay by charge principles simply involves the emission of an electron and the change from neutron to proton. This equation balances perfectly. However, it was observed that when particles decayed their momentums did not balance.

 

figure 1 the conservation of linear momentum from beta decay

 

From Classical physics we know that momentum is always conserved, that is:

 

Mprevious = Mresultant more specifically for decay:

 

The energy of the proton and electron must balance. If therefore the neutron were stationary, and we can define the neutron as our frame of reference and assume it is then the momentums after the decay must equal those before:

 

Momentum = Mass * Velocity

 

In this case it would be easy to imagine the two particles moving away at 180° from one another, the proton moving much more slowly than the electron:

The mass of the electron can be expressed as:

 

9.1096 * 10-31Kg

Against the mass of the significantly heavier proton:

1.67252 * 10-27Kg

 

therefore one would expect the difference in velocity to be of the order of

 

1.67252 * 10-27 Kg / 9.1096 * 10-31 Kg = 1835.99718977781680864143321331343

1835.997 to three decimal places

 

However in observations the proton and electron were not seen to move in opposite directions in all experiments and the velocity equations did not balance. It followed that there must be a more elusive particle that was neutral in charge, so as not to influence the balanced charge equation but able to alter the momentum. It was known that the mass of the proton and the electron were to within measurable resolution the same as that of the neutron so this meant that the neutrino must possess very high velocity to balance the equation. Experimental data states that the mass of the electron-neutrino must be less than 0.0004 that of the electron. There is, however, no compelling theoretical reason for the mass of the neutrino to be exactly zero.

This relationship was first proposed in 1930 by the Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli. The relationship was further elaborated upon in 1934 by the Italian-born physicist Enrico Fermi It was Fermi who first gave the particle its name that of the electron-neutrino, it is noted that during negative beta decay an electron-antineutrino is emitted

Neutrinos only interact with matter through the weak nuclear force and as such rarely interact with other particles and since they are not charged do not ionise materials. This gives them the ability to penetrate for great distances.

It is believed that only 1 in 10 billion, travelling through matter a distance equal to the Earth's diameter, reacts with a proton or neutron.

Electron-neutrinos were first experimentally observed in 1956 at the nuclear reactor at Savannah River, when a beam of antineutrinos from a nuclear reactor produced neutrons and positrons by reacting with protons. This therefore strictly created antineutrinos.

Another type of neutrino, produced when pi mesons (pions) decay, was conclusively shown (1962) to be a different species: the muon-neutrino. Although they are as unreactive as the other neutrinos, muon-neutrinos were found to produce muons but never electrons when they react with protons and neutrons. The American physicists Leon Lederman, Melvin Schwartz, and Jack Steinberger received the 1988 Nobel Prize for Physics for having established the identity of muon neutrinos. In the mid-1970s, particle physicists discovered yet another variety of charged lepton, the tau. A tau-neutrino and tau-antineutrino are associated with this third charged lepton.

Encyclopaedia Britannica

The masses of the various neutrinos would differ. It seems likely that though the electron neutrino is constrained to very low levels the constraints on the mass of other neutrinos is not as strict, though all would be significantly smaller than that of the proton. This property led to the belief that neutrino mass might be an uncounted part of the known mass of the Universe. This came at a time when people were becoming aware that there seemed to be a missing part of mass in the Universe. These particles are therefore theorised to add to the mass, they would be dark matter in that they are effectively undetectable, but could number in enormous quantities as relics of the big-bang. These and other particles of a similar nature are referred to as Weakly Interacting Particles or WIMPS.

Gribbin 1998

Unfortunately, the heavier types of neutrino are significantly less abundant than the electron-neutrino. The highest predicted mass so far is discussed by cosmologist Joel Primack (University of California, Santa Cruz),

“The Super-Kamiokande results imply that these elusive particles constitute at least 1/3 of 1 percent of the mass in the universe - as much as all of the visible stars and galaxies. If neutrinos weigh no more than that, they could not have played a significant role in shaping the universe's large-scale structure.” But David O. Caldwell (University of California, Santa Barbara), an investigator with the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector experiment at Los Alamos National Laboratory, says his team found that neutrino mass could be much higher. The problem is that current detection is putting the actual number of neutrinos far below that which theory predicts.

Sky Telescope; September 1998

The most common way of detecting neutrinos is to use large vats filled with solutions rich in chlorine atoms, the neutrinos can convert a few of the chlorine-37 (37Cl) atoms to argon-37 (37Ar) atoms with a half-life of 35 days. These atoms can then be detected by nuclear decay counting to determine the flux of the high-energy neutrinos striking the Earth.

 

v + 3717 Cl > 3718 Ar + e

These detectors are in the form of very large (of the order of 600 tonnes of tetrachloroethylene (Cl2Cl4). One in four of the chlorine atoms will be of the type 3717 Cl and hence, on average one atom in the molecule of chlorine will be of the type. The tank will contain something of the order of 2*1030 atoms of 3717 Cl. The detection involves the analysis of the electron type emitted in the decay of the argon, which is a 2.8 KeV event. The current detection is about one event every other day, whcih is only around a third the amount expected from models of solar neutrino modelling. (Roy and Clarke 1988 (a)). A similar experiment for detecting the much larger flux of the beryllium-7 (7Be) neutrinos of lower energy can now be done because of the ability to count a small number of krypton-81 atoms produced by neutrino capture in bromine-81 (81Br). Since the atoms are counted directly without waiting for radioactive decay, the 210,000-year half-life of krypton-81 is not an impediment.

Encyclopaedia Britannica

There are many neutrino detectors but the largest was constructed by a group of Japanese and American researchers led by Yoji Totsuka of the University of Tokyo. They built a detector consisting of a 12-story tank filled with pure water more than half a mile under a mountain in the Japanese Alps. Billions of neutrinos passed through the detector, called Super-Kamiokande, each second; every once in a while one would interact with a neutron or proton in the water, creating a flash of light. The tank is lined with 13,400 detectors that monitor flashes of light resulting from neutrinos interacting with the water molecules. The photo tubes along the inside of the tank recorded each event. While researchers detected pretty much what they thought they should, one type of neutrino failed to show up in the expected numbers.

Magazine: Astronomy, September 1998

 

return to homepage